Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Developer community
    • Building on open-source standards allows us to attract more contributors
    • Ease of development due to latest tech stack and popular industry technologies
  • Users
    • Faster player
    • Better User experience 
    • Lightweight device storage requirements for player installation
    • Help reduce content size due to template bundling
  • Product & Business team
    • Cost / Time / Effort of development would reduce
    • Faster feature dev
    • Customisations supported - various use-cases supported by one player

Discussion Points

Forward/Backward Compatibility of Questions Ex: Introduction of new capability would end us up with introducing new player version for content.


Introduction of New Question Types - introducing a new question type (new evaluation logic) requires you to upgrade the player or supports only..

Evaluation logic 1 : Select / Multi-select would support various MCQ templates

Evaluation logic 2 : Pairs would support various templates such as MTF, Reordering, Sequencing, Memory game

Evaluation logic 3 : Text input would support FTB, ordered FTB, unordered FTB, 

New evaluation logic requires player upgrade. Older players will not support these (question)